<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Show that Ruined Television</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2009/11/28/in-the-magazine/features/st-elsewhere-universe.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2009/11/28/in-the-magazine/trends-and-opinions/st-elsewhere-universe.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=st-elsewhere-universe</link>
	<description>Home of The Saturday Evening Post</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:02:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: amp</title>
		<link>http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2009/11/28/in-the-magazine/trends-and-opinions/st-elsewhere-universe.html/comment-page-1#comment-3771</link>
		<dc:creator>amp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 19:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/?p=14649#comment-3771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really enjoyed this article. The information was well-presented and interesting. It encouraged a bit of reflection, prompting me to go back and think; what does it now mean that all of my favorite shows are connected as part of some incredibly expansive television universe? What impossibilities or paradoxes are inherent in these connections? 

Sure... fiction is fiction, but rigor within that fictional world is still important. Just look at Lost.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed this article. The information was well-presented and interesting. It encouraged a bit of reflection, prompting me to go back and think; what does it now mean that all of my favorite shows are connected as part of some incredibly expansive television universe? What impossibilities or paradoxes are inherent in these connections? </p>
<p>Sure&#8230; fiction is fiction, but rigor within that fictional world is still important. Just look at Lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Rozewicki</title>
		<link>http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2009/11/28/in-the-magazine/trends-and-opinions/st-elsewhere-universe.html/comment-page-1#comment-3597</link>
		<dc:creator>John Rozewicki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/?p=14649#comment-3597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Error fixed. Thanks for noticing that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Error fixed. Thanks for noticing that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: df</title>
		<link>http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2009/11/28/in-the-magazine/trends-and-opinions/st-elsewhere-universe.html/comment-page-1#comment-3573</link>
		<dc:creator>df</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/?p=14649#comment-3573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tortelli premiered in 1987 and was a spinoff of Cheers; Cheers was not a spinoff of the Tortellis.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tortelli premiered in 1987 and was a spinoff of Cheers; Cheers was not a spinoff of the Tortellis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jgp</title>
		<link>http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2009/11/28/in-the-magazine/trends-and-opinions/st-elsewhere-universe.html/comment-page-1#comment-3556</link>
		<dc:creator>jgp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/?p=14649#comment-3556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Um.  Yeah.  And how exactly did this one show &quot;ruin&quot; television?  Simply repeating that opinion over and over doesn&#039;t prove much.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um.  Yeah.  And how exactly did this one show &#8220;ruin&#8221; television?  Simply repeating that opinion over and over doesn&#8217;t prove much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwd</title>
		<link>http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2009/11/28/in-the-magazine/trends-and-opinions/st-elsewhere-universe.html/comment-page-1#comment-3554</link>
		<dc:creator>jwd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/?p=14649#comment-3554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dumbass.  The snowglobe is a television set.  We are all basically autistic people out of touch with reality looking into a snowglobe. It is just a television show, no more important than what happens when you shake a snowglobe.

Good Lord.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dumbass.  The snowglobe is a television set.  We are all basically autistic people out of touch with reality looking into a snowglobe. It is just a television show, no more important than what happens when you shake a snowglobe.</p>
<p>Good Lord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
