Comments on: “Imagination Is More Important Than Knowledge”

By: Something

Something — Fri, 21 Sep 2012 01:32:00 +0000

Without imagination, there would be no knowledge. If imagination didn’t exist, the computar wouldn’t exist. None of Alberts’ creations would exist. The lightbuld wouldn’t exist, NOTHING would exist. If there was no imagination, everybody would the same, there would be no such thing an opinion. Life would be boring. That’s just the final truth. Goodbye.

By: Robert Brison

Robert Brison — Sun, 21 Mar 2010 15:42:21 +0000

Is imagination no longer relative to science?

Just check out the major U.S. search engines (Google, Yahoo, Bing, Ask) for the search term: A concept of space and time
You will find the same imagination-based essay at the TOP of each list of many millions of web sites.

Strangely, reference to this same concept has yet been hard to find in any scientific journal. What happened to imagination?

By: Ima Ryma

Ima Ryma — Sun, 21 Mar 2010 08:34:08 +0000

Albert Einstein did theorize
Relativity as a fact.
And it should come as no surprise
That humans seek by thought and act
To make the concept fit the way
That each one imagines as true.
And so the term gets lots of play
As all the many think and do,
And play with truth as though a toy.
In time and space he occupied,
What in his life was greatest joy?
To which Dr. Einstein replied,

“My sweetest relativity -”
“Making music with Mrs. E.”

By: Frank James Davis

Frank James Davis — Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:30:43 +0000

Not sure what the inclusion of “d” represents regarding Einstein’s mathematical expression of energy’s relationship to matter. The revised formula sounds a lot like a new rap group.
Acceptance of the reality of Relativity does not foster moral ambiguity–unless, of course, you believe a hammer is the same thing as a guiding principle.
This is one of Nilsson’s better articles–though I’ve always liked all things Einstein. Had a grandfather who resembled the humble genius quite closely.