<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Life In 1824, As Seen In Our Back Pages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2010/11/20/archives/art-adin-1824.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2010/11/20/archives/art-adin-1824.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=art-adin-1824</link>
	<description>Home of The Saturday Evening Post</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:02:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob McGowan</title>
		<link>http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2010/11/20/archives/art-adin-1824.html/comment-page-1#comment-38401</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob McGowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 04:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/?p=29424#comment-38401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I loved reading this gem from 1824, especially the paragraphs on the teacher/clerk etc. qualifications. It&#039;s an absolute hoot, but it is meant to indeed be taken seriously, as it would and should in 1824. I mean no disrespect in my finding some amusement in it. 

This is certainly an era of the POST probably little is known about today. It&#039;s an ancestor of the modern magazine we&#039;ve known since about 1900 and all the time periods and changes it&#039;s gone through, the latest which is 2009-present. It won&#039;t be the last, and neither will the one after that. As long as the POST sticks to it&#039;s ideals, Ben Franklin will be giving his guiding hand from above to the editors and publishers with pen in hand, glasses resting on his lower nose, and a smile on his face. He hasn&#039;t a problem or unkind word with an online presence, but thou shalt not do away with the one that goes to press and is in physical form to thy Americans who desire it as such. Enough has been said for now on the topic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved reading this gem from 1824, especially the paragraphs on the teacher/clerk etc. qualifications. It&#8217;s an absolute hoot, but it is meant to indeed be taken seriously, as it would and should in 1824. I mean no disrespect in my finding some amusement in it. </p>
<p>This is certainly an era of the POST probably little is known about today. It&#8217;s an ancestor of the modern magazine we&#8217;ve known since about 1900 and all the time periods and changes it&#8217;s gone through, the latest which is 2009-present. It won&#8217;t be the last, and neither will the one after that. As long as the POST sticks to it&#8217;s ideals, Ben Franklin will be giving his guiding hand from above to the editors and publishers with pen in hand, glasses resting on his lower nose, and a smile on his face. He hasn&#8217;t a problem or unkind word with an online presence, but thou shalt not do away with the one that goes to press and is in physical form to thy Americans who desire it as such. Enough has been said for now on the topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
