<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Classic Covers: Presidents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2011/02/19/art-entertainment/presidential-post-covers.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2011/02/19/art-entertainment/presidential-post-covers.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=presidential-post-covers</link>
	<description>Home of The Saturday Evening Post</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:02:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob McGowan</title>
		<link>http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2011/02/19/art-entertainment/presidential-post-covers.html/comment-page-1#comment-348249</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob McGowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 05:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/?p=30906#comment-348249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These are all great Presidential covers Diana. It&#039;s interesting too to note how the logo was tweaked between 1900-1903, with the final refinement in late 1903 being used to this day with a mid-century hiatus from 1942-1969. 

As to Vanessa Scott&#039;s question, I have that edition as well. As to it&#039;s value, it&#039;s an incredible historical issue that has a lot of sentimental value to me. Monetary is not something I&#039;ve ever thought about, or wouldn&#039;t. But figuring that&#039;s what she&#039;s referring to, I would think a lot would have to do with the condition her particular copy of this issue is in. Being the unusual historical issue it is, I would think (in general) it would/should be worth more typically than most other issues from the same time period.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are all great Presidential covers Diana. It&#8217;s interesting too to note how the logo was tweaked between 1900-1903, with the final refinement in late 1903 being used to this day with a mid-century hiatus from 1942-1969. </p>
<p>As to Vanessa Scott&#8217;s question, I have that edition as well. As to it&#8217;s value, it&#8217;s an incredible historical issue that has a lot of sentimental value to me. Monetary is not something I&#8217;ve ever thought about, or wouldn&#8217;t. But figuring that&#8217;s what she&#8217;s referring to, I would think a lot would have to do with the condition her particular copy of this issue is in. Being the unusual historical issue it is, I would think (in general) it would/should be worth more typically than most other issues from the same time period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vanessa scott</title>
		<link>http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2011/02/19/art-entertainment/presidential-post-covers.html/comment-page-1#comment-118443</link>
		<dc:creator>vanessa scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/?p=30906#comment-118443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have the 1963 Saturday Evening Post addition of the assasination of John F. Kennedy. Just wondering if it is of any value.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the 1963 Saturday Evening Post addition of the assasination of John F. Kennedy. Just wondering if it is of any value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
