<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Vitamin D and Calcium Help Prevent Skin Cancer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2011/07/07/health-and-family/medical-update/vitamin-calcium-prevent-skin-cancer.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2011/07/07/health-and-family/medical-update/vitamin-calcium-prevent-skin-cancer.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=vitamin-calcium-prevent-skin-cancer</link>
	<description>Home of The Saturday Evening Post</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:02:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mona</title>
		<link>http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2011/07/07/health-and-family/medical-update/vitamin-calcium-prevent-skin-cancer.html/comment-page-1#comment-160741</link>
		<dc:creator>Mona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 16:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/?p=35433#comment-160741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Calcium carbonate is not even a good calcium to take.  It isn&#039;t absorbed well.  It used to keep from having heartburn and destroys acid in your stomach.  Nutritionist&#039;s say it like taking chalk.  Calcium citrate is better absorbed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calcium carbonate is not even a good calcium to take.  It isn&#8217;t absorbed well.  It used to keep from having heartburn and destroys acid in your stomach.  Nutritionist&#8217;s say it like taking chalk.  Calcium citrate is better absorbed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Braun</title>
		<link>http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2011/07/07/health-and-family/medical-update/vitamin-calcium-prevent-skin-cancer.html/comment-page-1#comment-137745</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Braun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/?p=35433#comment-137745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elise ~ Let me try to clear it up! In this study, researchers divided women into 2 groups:  Group #1 was women who had basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer in the past (which puts them at high risk for the deadly melanoma kind) and Group #2 was women who had never been diagnosed with skin cancer. Half of the women in each group took calcium and vitamin D pills, and the other half took inactive pills. The bottom line? Taking calcium and vitamin D pills helped prevent melanoma in Group #1 -- but not in Group #2.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elise ~ Let me try to clear it up! In this study, researchers divided women into 2 groups:  Group #1 was women who had basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer in the past (which puts them at high risk for the deadly melanoma kind) and Group #2 was women who had never been diagnosed with skin cancer. Half of the women in each group took calcium and vitamin D pills, and the other half took inactive pills. The bottom line? Taking calcium and vitamin D pills helped prevent melanoma in Group #1 &#8212; but not in Group #2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elise Beron</title>
		<link>http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2011/07/07/health-and-family/medical-update/vitamin-calcium-prevent-skin-cancer.html/comment-page-1#comment-136551</link>
		<dc:creator>Elise Beron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 02:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/?p=35433#comment-136551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t understand.  The article seems to contradict itself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand.  The article seems to contradict itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
