http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2012/05/29/in-the-magazine/processing-claims.html?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=processing-claims Home of The Saturday Evening Post Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:02:56 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5 http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2012/05/29/in-the-magazine/processing-claims.html/comment-page-1#comment-280125 lauren Sat, 30 Jun 2012 02:35:37 +0000 http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/?p=56610#comment-280125 i think the idea that you could have a lengthy conversation with your ex without his recognizing your voice is patently unbelievable; and the idea that she could arbitrarily approve claims likewise unbelievable. i also thought this concept did not sustain a story.

]]> http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2012/05/29/in-the-magazine/processing-claims.html/comment-page-1#comment-276710 Christine Venzon Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:29:49 +0000 http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/?p=56610#comment-276710 Excellent piece of writing. It moved cleanly and briskly, never lagged or got sidetracked. The ending was subtle and satisfying.

]]> http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2012/05/29/in-the-magazine/processing-claims.html/comment-page-1#comment-259858 Tony Sun, 03 Jun 2012 03:36:47 +0000 http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/?p=56610#comment-259858 Interesting writing but I couldn’t believe that a professional attorney would not ask the name of the person to whom he was speaking.

]]> http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2012/05/29/in-the-magazine/processing-claims.html/comment-page-1#comment-256883 Joshua Wed, 30 May 2012 10:22:39 +0000 http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/?p=56610#comment-256883 This story was pretty decent. Having her ex be the caller was interesting. However, the story didn’t really enthrall me as much as i would’ve liked.

]]>