<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beatlemania: No Passing Fad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2012/08/20/archives/beatles.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2012/08/20/archives/beatles.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=beatles</link>
	<description>Home of The Saturday Evening Post</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:02:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob McGowan</title>
		<link>http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2012/08/20/archives/beatles.html/comment-page-1#comment-322628</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob McGowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 20:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/?p=69087#comment-322628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The editors of the POST wisely swooped on the Beatles shortly after their appearance on &#039;The Ed Sullivan Show&#039;. This is a great example of some of the wonderful features the magazine did in the &#039;60s, including this terrific cover. The magazine also did another great feature on the Beatles later in 1964, as well as a couple more later in the decade. 

The POST was very cutting-edge in the Sixties on popular musical artists, outdoing its two main rivals, LIFE and Look magazine. I&#039;m very pleased to see covers and features from this decade hightlighted often on this website. POST issues from this decade have long gone unappreciated, partly I suppose because of the break (in tradition)from the many decades worth of the artistic covers that preceeded them. I think this era can finally be appreciated for itself, without (or at least less) comparison to previous eras. It&#039;s all part of the tapestry of The Saturday Evening Post that&#039;s been evolving since it began, and will continue to do so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The editors of the POST wisely swooped on the Beatles shortly after their appearance on &#8216;The Ed Sullivan Show&#8217;. This is a great example of some of the wonderful features the magazine did in the &#8217;60s, including this terrific cover. The magazine also did another great feature on the Beatles later in 1964, as well as a couple more later in the decade. </p>
<p>The POST was very cutting-edge in the Sixties on popular musical artists, outdoing its two main rivals, LIFE and Look magazine. I&#8217;m very pleased to see covers and features from this decade hightlighted often on this website. POST issues from this decade have long gone unappreciated, partly I suppose because of the break (in tradition)from the many decades worth of the artistic covers that preceeded them. I think this era can finally be appreciated for itself, without (or at least less) comparison to previous eras. It&#8217;s all part of the tapestry of The Saturday Evening Post that&#8217;s been evolving since it began, and will continue to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
