<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Classic Covers: Election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2012/09/07/art-entertainment/election-covers.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2012/09/07/art-entertainment/election-covers.html?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=election-covers</link>
	<description>Home of The Saturday Evening Post</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:02:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob McGowan</title>
		<link>http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2012/09/07/art-entertainment/election-covers.html/comment-page-1#comment-346955</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob McGowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 22:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/?p=70821#comment-346955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr. Neumann&#039;s points are excellent and totally true. My two favorites are also the family/couple divided one&#039;s, and the argument by the potbelly stove; not just artistically, but conceptually. 

Sadly, I suppose, I just can&#039;t even imagine a couple or anyone really, arguing over candidates today, or even the past few decades. Most Presidencies within my lifetime have ranged from tragic (age 6 1/2) to failed in one manner or another. This, coupled with the average American just trying to survive, not feeling that we even matter at all, has left most of us feeling for years now no President is going to come along on a white horse and &#039;save the day&#039;. So quiet, brief opinion have largely replaced the depictions seen in these wonderful charming covers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Neumann&#8217;s points are excellent and totally true. My two favorites are also the family/couple divided one&#8217;s, and the argument by the potbelly stove; not just artistically, but conceptually. </p>
<p>Sadly, I suppose, I just can&#8217;t even imagine a couple or anyone really, arguing over candidates today, or even the past few decades. Most Presidencies within my lifetime have ranged from tragic (age 6 1/2) to failed in one manner or another. This, coupled with the average American just trying to survive, not feeling that we even matter at all, has left most of us feeling for years now no President is going to come along on a white horse and &#8216;save the day&#8217;. So quiet, brief opinion have largely replaced the depictions seen in these wonderful charming covers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Neumann</title>
		<link>http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2012/09/07/art-entertainment/election-covers.html/comment-page-1#comment-345957</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Neumann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 01:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/?p=70821#comment-345957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some excellent Post covers on elections. I loved the Rockwell family divided ones, but the two at the conventions were really interesting. In those days, the conventions would often decide the nominee, today that is long since determined. That is one reason the conventions are not as important as they once were.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some excellent Post covers on elections. I loved the Rockwell family divided ones, but the two at the conventions were really interesting. In those days, the conventions would often decide the nominee, today that is long since determined. That is one reason the conventions are not as important as they once were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
