Pelican Bay State Prison is designed to house California’s most serious criminal offenders. Photo courtesy California State Department of Corrections.

We are facing a crisis in America. The crisis is largely hidden from view, but like a cancer, it threatens the very health of society. We have become a superpower of incarceration. Today we warehouse 2.2 million inmates according to the most recent U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics report.

That’s more than the entire population of Houston. More than two-thirds that of Chicago.

China, with more than four times the U.S. population, is a distant second with 1.5 million inmates. The United States imprisons 760 people per 100,000. The number for France is 96, Germany 90, and Japan 63. As an NAACP advertisement points out, we are 5 percent of the world’s population and we house 25 percent of the world’s prisoners.

How did we get here? Between 1925 and 1972, our state inmate population increased 105 percent—roughly proportionate to the country’s overall growth. Since 1973, when stiffer sentencing came in—particularly the so-called Rockefeller drug laws providing lengthy minimum sentences for possession of small quantities of banned substances—the number of prisoners has increased more than 700 percent. That’s about 14 times the country’s overall growth.
The costs are staggering. In a survey of 40 participating states, the Vera Institute of Justice concluded that U.S. taxpayers were shouldering an annual bill of $39 billion. And that’s just the direct costs. Indirect costs, which tend to be carried by government agencies other than corrections departments, are incalculable.

“The system is so skewed,” laments Bob DeSena, executive director of Council For Unity, an anti-gang initiative headquartered in New York City. “As a society we are completely focused on punishment. People are willing to spend hundreds of thousands on incarceration, but they don’t want to spend a few dollars on programs that are proven to prevent them from becoming criminals in the first place.”

What to do with criminals—what warrants imprisonment, for how long, and how to reintegrate released men and women—is one of society’s most difficult challenges. In modern times, the great philosophical debate has been whether the mission is to reform or to punish. And possibly no society has cycled quite so widely between the two extremes as America.

The prison reform movement started more than 200 years ago, in the throes of the Industrial Revolution when a surge in the urban population came with a steep rise in crime. At the time, jail was little more than a means of segregating malefactors from the rest of the population. Perpetrators who weren’t killed outright (Pennsylvania, the first state to outlaw capital punishment for theft, didn’t do so until 1786) were dealt with harshly, confined in dungeons or tawdry, violent, and often disease-ridden jails.

One early attempt at reform was nearly as harsh as the system it replaced. New York’s Auburn Prison, built in 1816, was governed by the then-radical notion that prisoners were capable of change. Hence, prisoners were put to work, and community activity was encouraged during the day. But strict silence was enforced at all times, and prisoners were isolated in solitary confinement at night. Prisoners who so much as broke the silence were flogged or hung by their wrists or had their heads locked in iron cages.

Jailhouse Blues The Saturday Evening Post

As part of an ongoing collaboration between Council for Unity and Redglass Pictures, maximum security prison inmate Jason Diadema explains what drove him to gang violence and how Council For Unity helped him make the tough choice to leave his gang.

Council for Unity The Saturday Evening Post

Click here to download the full article “The Penalty Worse Than Death” (August 31, 1957) by Douglas C. Rigg, or read below. (See also “Jailhouse Blues” in the Jan/Feb 2013 issue.)

The Penalty Worse Than Death The Saturday Evening Post

Click here to download the full article “America’s Toughest Prison” (October 27, 1957) by John Bartlow Martin, or read below. (See also “Jailhouse Blues” in the Jan/Feb 2013 issue.)

America’s Toughest Prison The Saturday Evening Post

The Post has covered the question of reform vs. contain in America’s prisons since the 1800s. The following articles from our archives, and a more recent video from the Council for Unity, take additional looks at this controversial topic.

Council for Unity Video

Council for Unity

Bob DeSena started the Council for Unity to reform inmates who had been sentenced for violent crimes related to gang activity. In this video, ex-gang member Jason Diadema tells how the program has helped him.

December 7, 1822

Pennsylvania Legislature

In 1822, the Pennsylvania Legislature discussed adding treadmills as a form of “labour” and discipline to two new prisons being erected in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh.

August 31, 1957

The Penalty Worse Than Death

Post writer Douglas C. Rigg reported on the mental and emotional anguish of prison inmates who had been given life sentences, and the argument for reforming America’s concept of “punishment” in 1957.

October 27, 1957

America’s Toughest Prison

In 1957, the Post questioned the legitimacy of practices at Illinois State Penitentiary, where the emphasis was security and confinement of inmates, not reform.

Post Perspective: Prisons The Saturday Evening Post

Click here to download the full article “Pennsylvania Legislature” (December 7, 1822) from the Post archives, or read below. (See also “Jailhouse Blues” in the Jan/Feb 2013 issue.)

Pennsylvania Legislature The Saturday Evening Post