From the Archive: Filling or Killing Children’s Imaginations

The Post editors believed escapist stories were too powerful for youngsters.

Engraving by Robert Wallis, 1846 (Wellcome Collection via the CC Attribution 4.0 International license)

Weekly Newsletter

The best of The Saturday Evening Post in your inbox!

SUPPORT THE POST

—From the editorial “Doped Fiction” in the December 4, 1915, issue of The Saturday Evening Post

They [children’s books] describe how a 14-year-old boy, with a leaky washtub and two dollars in cash, built a submarine that destroyed the enemy’s fleet, or circumvented a gang of desperate criminals and became president of a railroad at 16.

These tales of preposterous juvenile achievement are depraved because they are monstrous lies. They do not stimulate a boy’s imagination; they drug it. They do not set his imagination usefully at work, but send it off in a weird opium dream. They do not brace and enlarge a boy’s mind. They are a sort of psychological whisky that makes the victim unresponsive to wholesome, natural tonics and begets a flabby craving for the artificial kick.

Read “Doped Fiction” from the December 4, 1915 issue of The Saturday Evening Post

 

Become a Saturday Evening Post member and enjoy unlimited access. Subscribe now

Comments

  1. What a great editorial this is. Not just what is said, but the wonderful WAY it’s said here. Still and all, that aside, the core message here is for parents to be aware (to the best extent possible) what their son or daughter is reading or today, watching online. Ideally, it should be mind expansion in the best sense of the word. Sometimes though, speaking for myself, a weird opium dream every so often may be just what the doctor ordered.

Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *