Considering History: Predatory Men, Vulnerable Women, and Foundational American Texts and Lives

The debates about gender relationships have been part of America since our founding era.

Woman in Victorian dress on a bed crying into a pillow, while a bearded man with a pipe, and a rabbit, stare at her.

Weekly Newsletter

The best of The Saturday Evening Post in your inbox!

SUPPORT THE POST

This column by American studies professor Ben Railton explores the connections between America’s past and present.

Relationships between men and women have dominated our national headlines and conversations for the last few weeks. We’re collectively debating questions of whether “boys will be boys” and what constitutes predatory behavior and sexual assault, and whether girls and women who testify to their experiences are vulnerable victims or manipulative “con” artists. In an extension of the #MeToo moment, we’re engaging with narratives of sex and agency, of ideals and realities of gender and relationships, and of whether and how women can escape or transcend all of these limiting images through their own voice.

While much about this moment feels strikingly new, these debates have been part of America since our founding era. Indeed, two of our first bestselling novels helped construct some of the first such images in popular culture, in two very different ways that parallel more and less sympathetic narratives of women, but ultimately portray them as powerless victims.

British-American writer Susanna (Haswell) Rowson published more than twenty books in the course of her prolific career, but it was Charlotte: A Tale of Truth (1791), that would become the bestselling early American novel. Despite its telling subtitle (partly an attempt to avoid the era’s critiques of fiction as immoral), Charlotte was not based on any one historical figure or story; instead, Rowson built on various contemporary images of sex and seduction to create her portrayal of a beautiful, naive 15-year old girl who was tragically used, abandoned, and destroyed by a predatory man and his privileged allies.

Illustrated side portrait of Susanna Rowson
Susanna Rowson (Albert and Shirley Small Special Collections Library, University of Virginia)

Charlotte’s world features a clear-cut vision of right and wrong, good and evil. From the first moment he sees the innocent Charlotte, the villainous English soldier Montraville sets out to seduce her, with the help of his equally predatory friend Belcour and Charlotte’s elitist teacher Mademoiselle La Rue. Their plot requires them to bring Charlotte to the United States, seemingly a more lawless space where Montraville can get Charlotte pregnant and then abandon her to her fate. That fate includes not just single motherhood and poverty but also defamation, shame, and eventually death, as Charlotte’s introduction to the world of romance and sex entirely destroys her. She is entirely passive but a thoroughgoing victim, not just of one predatory man but of an entire social order (Mademoiselle La Rue is particularly heartless in her consistent refusals to aid Charlotte). Rowson’s amplified the era’s narratives of young women as innocent, even angelic creatures located apart from adult society’s realities and vices, an impossible position for adult women to occupy comfortably.

Another early bestselling novel, Hannah Webster Foster’s anonymously published The Coquette; or, The History of Eliza Wharton (1797), offers a very distinct and much more critical (if certainly still nuanced) depiction of women and sex. Foster’s titular protagonist was based closely on the prominent and scandalous story of Elizabeth Whitman (1752-1788), a Connecticut socialite who was known for her flirtations with various social and literary figures and who, at the age of 36, died after giving birth in a Massachusetts tavern to a stillborn, illegitimate child. As stories of Whitman’s “disappointment” and death circulated throughout New England, minsters and other public figures used it as the occasion for moral lectures about sex and romance, and out of those narratives Foster created her “Novel, Founded on Fact.”

Illustration of author Hannah Webster Foster
Hannah Webster Foster (Wikimedia Commons)

The Coquette creates its story out of letters between its main characters and others in their lives, and as such it does offer a multi-layered perspective and portrayal of its fictional version of Elizabeth Whitman. But while Foster’s Eliza Wharton is still in some ways the victim of a predatory seducer, the immoral Major Peter Sanford, she is also far more of a manipulative contributor to her own tragic fate: Wharton turns down the honest and dedicated affections of Reverend J. Boyer in favor of Sanford’s flirtations. When Sanford eventually leaves her to marry another woman, Wharton continues her affair with him nonetheless, and it is that adulterous relationship that produces the unmarried pregnancy that leads to Wharton’s shame and death. While Wharton is thus likewise destroyed by romance and sex, her “coquettish” personality and desires have made her a more active participant in that arc; in Foster’s narrative, women’s sexuality is at least in part a dangerous thing, one that links them to predatory men and scandalous ends. Since adult women could never quite remain the angelic figures illustrated by Rowson’s Charlotte, such narratives of their fallen and threatening nature became central parts of the period’s images as well.

Elizabeth Whitman's tombstone.
The gravesite of Elizabeth Whitman. (By Bryan Waterman [CC0], via Wikimedia Commons)
If Charlotte Temple and Eliza Wharton thus exemplify two distinct but similarly limiting images of women, Judith Sargent Murray (1751-1820), another prominent 1790s writer and activist, modeled an alternative to both, one featuring far more agency for women’s voices. Judith Sargent’s early adult life seemed destined to follow a tragic path similar to those fictional stories. Born and raised in Gloucester, Massachusetts, Sargent married local ship captain John Stevens when she was only 18 years old. Stevens would spend the next decades accruing substantial debt, and when he abandoned Sargent to escape debtors’ prison (he died in the West Indies in 1786), she was left both a single mother to their daughter and solely responsible for her husband’s debt. Yet she had already begun to write and publish groundbreaking journalism, essays, and poems. Through those works and her progressive social ideas she connected with the Unitarian Universalist Reverend John Murray, who in 1788 would become her second husband and a lifelong partner.

Painted portrait of Judith Sargent Murray
Judith Sargent Murray (by John Singleton Copley [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons)
Judith Sargent Murray published many significant works throughout the 1790s and beyond, with the three-volume collection The Gleaner (1798) representing a career highlight. But it was one of Murray’s first published works, the poem and essay “On the Equality of the Sexes” (1790), that offers with striking clarity an alternative and empowering vision of women’s voices. In the short opening poem, Murray reflects on how narratives of women have limited and oppressed their identities, writing, “But imbecility is still confin’d,/And by the lordly sex to us consign’d;/They rob us of the power to improve,/And then declare we only trifles love.” Yet in the essay that follows, and in every part of her career and life, Murray embodies the limitless possibilities of women to challenge and transcend such images, express their voices, and contribute to every aspect of their community and society.

Become a Saturday Evening Post member and enjoy unlimited access. Subscribe now

Comments

  1. This well written and researched feature shows the fundamentally and irrevocably flawed state of the human condition in the 18th century, which was thousands of years old then. Such injustices have continued in the U.S. with certain improvements here and there, often with those improvements backsliding while others do take hold.

    The authors here, Hannah Webster Foster and Judith Sargent Murray are remarkable. I would like to read in more depth what they had to say at the time. Thank you for the links and including the striking portrait of Ms. Murray. It comes close to photographic portraiture. I’d like to see more of this artist’s work.

    Nothing is ever simple and clear cut. There are men stabbing other men in the back, women doing so to other women, men doing so to women, women doing so to men, government and corporations doing so to nearly everyone including animals and the environment.

    Today it would seem fixing problems would be easier than in the past with technology, communications (of ALL kinds) and more! But the fantasy we’ve created that we’re in a more “enlightened age” has been completely unmasked for the lie it is. The more technology we have, the worse everything’s gotten. Sorry.

    Technology has made a lot of people really stupid as its turned out. And college, still rooted in the 19th century, remains one of the biggest destructive forces of perpetuating two of the biggest problems we have today: racism and sexism. Fraternities might as well have Harvey Weinstein, Jerry Sandusky and Bill Cosby as their official mascots. Really disgusting; so much so it’s a miracle these problems aren’t even worse than they are.

    You might know that THEIR message is getting out loud and clear. Even IT might still be easier to combat, if everything (and I mean everything) wasn’t so broken and out of control in the U.S. At work this past week I’ve heard more women defending Brett Kavanaugh (speaking against Christine Ford–yes) and more men defending Ford and speaking out against Kavanaugh! Again, nothing is clear cut or all one way. You have women today far more successful than a lot of men income-wise and in other areas. Many girls ARE excelling, with a lot of boys completely lost and confused, left in the dust of contradictory modern life.

    The bottom line is there’s long way to go where, under the best of circumstances, progress will be made; but then undone like sand castles on the beach. The fact that society is becoming more gender-neutral, is helping. Not being able to do much about bad people determined to cause trouble (regardless of which kind) is the real nightmare, and a basically unsolvable riddle that will go on, unfortunately. At least a lot of things are being exposed, but require calm and levelheadedness to take hold. This can’t happen in society of constant hatred, misinformation and screaming. Solving that is a prerequisite before fixing anything else. How do we do that?!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *