Is 100-Year-Old Wisdom Still Relevant?

E.W. Howe’s pithy folk aphorisms on grit and perseverance were all the rage a century ago or more, but the forgotten writer’s hard-knock philosophy hasn’t exactly held up.

E.W. Howe

Weekly Newsletter

The best of The Saturday Evening Post in your inbox!

SUPPORT THE POST

“When a father gives his son good advice, he is probably as wise as the sages of old,” Edgar Watson Howe wrote in this magazine 100 years ago. “Few children go astray as the result of taking the advice of a father or mother.”

And yet: “I don’t know which is the more objectionable, an old man’s conceit because of his wisdom, or a young man’s because of his youth.” What Howe’s aphorisms may have lacked in consistency, they made up for in volume.

If your grandparents or great-grandparents lived in the U.S. a century ago and displayed an indestructible ethic for thrift and hard work coupled with animosity for shiftlessness, they might have absorbed the work of the prolific and quotable Howe.

Like a lot of “crackerbox philosophers” of his time, Howe assembled humorous columns and stories from the folksy lessons of his rural Midwestern life. He wrote about the peculiar inhabitants of middle America’s small towns in his “nonfiction novels” like The Anthology of Another Town, and he gave regular opinion and advice in his nationally-circulating E.W. Howe’s Monthly, “devoted to indignation and information.” Although Howe has been functionally wiped from the American consciousness, his sage quips were all the rage in the early 20th century, reprinted in papers from coast to coast regularly. Mark Twain praised Howe’s unique depictions of small-town life, writing, “you may have caught the only fish there was in your pond.”

“Millions of men have lived millions of years and tried everything,” Howe wrote. “Anyone who bets on his judgment against the judgment of the world will be punished for folly.” But his own judgment met plenty of skepticism.

In Howe’s writings for The Saturday Evening Post, he replicated his “common sense” approach to life that praised grit and persistence and pitied his lazier peers who just couldn’t see that “success is easier than failure.” His hard-knock ethical code wasn’t roundly received as scripture. Howe’s critics pointed to the Panic of 1893, widespread poverty among hard-working immigrants, and the inescapable hardships of the Great Depression as proof that reality was antithetical to his fixation on self-reliance.

Howe insisted that the old sentimental story of the poor man jailed for stealing bread for his starving family was pure fiction, that any such criminal would be met with a system ready to “relieve his distress” instead of persecuting him. Writing in The Nation in 1934, critic Ernest Boyd claimed the “fundamental falsity” of Howe’s ideas “has been obvious to every thinking person since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, at least.”

After his death, in 1941, Howe’s son wrote about him in a Post article titled “My Father Was the Most Wretchedly Unhappy Man I Ever Knew.” Gene Howe confessed that he had been terrified of his father’s wrath his entire life, describing the elder Howe’s rigid positions against women and religion. “I do not believe there ever lived a writer who could hurt as he did,” Gene Howe wrote, “who was so blunt and direct, and who could lacerate so deeply. I know he did not realize this himself.”

Still, Howe’s son contended that his father operated with the sole purpose of saving humanity from itself by publicizing far and wide the “virtue of selfishness.”

E.W. Howe’s essay “A New Traveler Over an Old Road,” printed 100 years ago in the Post, offers glimpses of a controversial thinker’s “accumulated wisdom”:

  1. “The devil is dead; but he never took so much interest in your misconduct as your neighbors did. And the neighbors are still here to watch you.”
  2. “Our list of wrongs is becoming too long. It is evidence that we either invent wrongs or are too lazy to remedy them. Whatever is palpably wrong with your plumbing, your teeth, your drainage, your county, city, congressional district, state or nation, should be fixed, and usually can be. It is an inefficient man who forever fusses about his wrongs and does nothing.”
  3. “If there is a little merit in a printed composition — a suggestion of an idea, a clever expression of an old one — it is all you have a right to expect. If it is dull, as is usually the case, dismiss it without prejudice against the poor author, who is probably a bundle of weaknesses and prejudices, as you are. Writing is not a divine art; it is as tiresomely human as is conversation. What is there to eat that has not been eaten? What is there new to say in print?”
  4. “Don’t get yourself in a situation where you need vindication. After a complete vindication a good many will have doubts of your innocence.”
  5. “Probably every man has a little superstition; I doubt if even the bold editor of The Truth Seeker entirely escapes. Those who do not pray, knock on wood. I sometimes think that, from my helplessness as a fool, I have sacrificed my life a dozen times, and that something that came in on an east wind saved me. The three wise men came from the east long ago, but there are others there to this day.”
  6. “I do not care to fool any man; when he discovers I have fooled him he will do me more harm than my cunning did me good. If you get the best of a bargain by cunning, better give it back before the policeman arrives.”
  7. “Exaggerating the rewards of virtue is in bad taste. A man may practice all the virtues and not be notably prosperous or happy; but he will get along better than the idle or unscrupulous. A good man will have pains and difficulties as surely as the wicked man, but he will have fewer of them. This is about all that may be truthfully said in favor of virtue.”
  8. “A new idea is not enough; it must be a good idea also. I have no wish to write a well-rounded or eloquent sentence that will cause anyone to believe that which is untrue or unfair.”
First page of the story "A New Traveler over an Old Road" by E.W. Howe
Read “A New Traveler Over an Old Road” by E. W. Howe from the October 9, 1920, issue of the Post. Subscribe to the magazine for more art, inspiring stories, fiction, humor, and features from our archives.

Featured image: “The Philosopher of Potato Hill,” 1905-1910, The Kansas Historical Society

Become a Saturday Evening Post member and enjoy unlimited access. Subscribe now

Comments

  1. Thanks Nick for this deep dive into E.W. Howe’s literary swimming pool here. I agree that some of his hard-knock philosophy hasn’t held up, but a lot has. It needs to be read and thought over more than once. It’s still ‘newer’ than Mark Twain’s observations, much less Fanny Fern’s.

    I don’t think I’ve ever read and enjoyed one person’s writings and observations any more than Ms. Fern’s well over 2 years ago on this site, and said so then. But now we have Mr. Howe, whose son (Gene) portrays him in the ‘Daddy Dearest’ mode. This can’t be overlooked or dismissed, and likely sheds light on some of dad’s wit and wisdom that might even take Ben Franklin aback. Here’s my take on it:

    #1 is clever to ponder, and seems to have truth to it.

    #2 ideally would be good today, but too much bureaucracy. Still, we have to try. I mailed mine in today.

    #3. He obviously hasn’t read today’s wonderful Post, with my unique comments that ARE something new to be said, Mr. E.W. Howe.

    #4 This is true. We’ve seen it, way too many times.

    #5 Hmmm. This one basically says it’s a good idea to pray. It is. Especially over the next few months.

    #6 Well said. Honesty is the best policy. Something our corporate, Wall St. only government knows nothing about.

    #7 Yes. He’s right. You just have to read it slowly a couple of times though.

    #8 This is true. See #6 again.

    I can see why some of his hard-knock philosophy hasn’t “held up” because too many people are offended at EVERYTHING, and lose his (mostly) timely messages for that reason, because it’s not stated in a weak stick manner that’s the strongest today’s Americans can take, or understand. To THAT end, do most American’s today have even HALF the vocabulary of someone in 1920? Sadly no!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *